U10 GIRLS AFC ADIDAS TOURNAMENT ****PREDICTIONS*****

Referee wrote: AHEM! Cough, cough!

Feeters 1-0 SRSA.

LIke Jimmy Johnson once said. Hate to tell you that I told you, but I told you.

Referee wrote: AHEM! Cough, cough!

Feeters 1-0 SRSA.

LIke Jimmy Johnson once said. Hate to tell you that I told you, but I told you.

Referee wrote: AHEM! Cough, cough!

Feeters 1-0 SRSA.

LIke Jimmy Johnson once said. Hate to tell you that I told you, but I told you.

MrBoomstick wrote:

Referee wrote: AHEM! Cough, cough!

Feeters 1-0 SRSA.

LIke Jimmy Johnson once said. Hate to tell you that I told you, but I told you.

Did Feeters have any guest players?

bobmac15 wrote:

MrBoomstick wrote:

Referee wrote: AHEM! Cough, cough!

Feeters 1-0 SRSA.

LIke Jimmy Johnson once said. Hate to tell you that I told you, but I told you.

Did Feeters have any guest players?

Anyone?? Comments?? This was a big underdog win. Certainly there's some insight. Guests, Colvin players absent, rain, snow?

soccerobsessed wrote:

bobmac15 wrote:

MrBoomstick wrote:

Referee wrote: AHEM! Cough, cough!

Feeters 1-0 SRSA.

LIke Jimmy Johnson once said. Hate to tell you that I told you, but I told you.

Did Feeters have any guest players?

Anyone?? Comments?? This was a big underdog win. Certainly there's some insight. Guests, Colvin players absent, rain, snow?

I heard they had two guests. The keeper and another girl.

Oh...and a third player....THE WIND. It was insane and blowing from goal to goal...sometimes in huge gusts. Not to take anything from feet but it wasn't a pretty goal...wind definitely had an assist.

Side Note: D'feeters old keeper was playing as keeper for Sting Goodman.

MrBoomstick wrote:

soccerobsessed wrote:

bobmac15 wrote:

MrBoomstick wrote:

Referee wrote: AHEM! Cough, cough!

Feeters 1-0 SRSA.

LIke Jimmy Johnson once said. Hate to tell you that I told you, but I told you.

Did Feeters have any guest players?

Anyone?? Comments?? This was a big underdog win. Certainly there's some insight. Guests, Colvin players absent, rain, snow?

I heard they had two guests. The keeper and another girl.

Oh...and a third player....THE WIND. It was insane and blowing from goal to goal...sometimes in huge gusts. Not to take anything from feet but it wasn't a pretty goal...wind definitely had an assist.

Side Note: D'feeters old keeper was playing as keeper for Sting Goodman.

I just heard that the keeper and a forward were guesting from FC Dallas Rangel. Either way, Great WIN feeters!

Referee wrote: The wind is no factor. It affects both teams the same. Feeters won. Their goalie is with Sting now and if anybody was short it was them. Look for SRSA to come out swinging on Saturday. Top teams have more to lose on these tournaments. Can't go any higher. They have nowhere to go but down.

omgwtf wrote:

Referee wrote: The wind is no factor. It affects both teams the same. Feeters won. Their goalie is with Sting now and if anybody was short it was them. Look for SRSA to come out swinging on Saturday. Top teams have more to lose on these tournaments. Can't go any higher. They have nowhere to go but down.

Why not tell anyone about what really happened in game instead the wind was not factor? What team controlled better? What team had the better possession of football? What was shots on goal for each team? This forum is lots noise but no information but goals.

Referee wrote: Soccer is about goals. The one who scores the most wins. Always. It is not about who controls the most or plays prettier. You want pretty? Go to a pageant contest. It is about winning the game when the opportunity presents itself. I watch a lot of games and the ones who hug the ball and make it pretty don't always win. Sometimes a power team controls the ball all afternoon. Then one mistake and the opponent scores just one goal and wins.
Never seen or heard of a game where anybody went up to the ref to say "Our team outplayed the other, we moved it better, had better control, we had more shots on goal and our girls are prettier, therefore you should give us the win"
I wasn't there and just saw the score. Pretty soccer won't take you anywhere if you don't win. How is the wind a factor? They switch sides at half time. Does it affect SRSA more than Feeters? If so, how?
One could argue about being to windy, to hot, to wet, to cold, etc. But again, it affects both teams the same
when they're both out there. Is not like Feeters were playing with a wind protector of some sort.
I'm not a Feeter fan or parent. Just giving credit where its due.

oldboot wrote:Who cares about the soccer that was actually played on the field. Lets talk about those Feet uniforms. That logo is so old and tired - when are they going to come out with something new?

Referee wrote: Soccer is about goals. The one who scores the most wins. Always. It is not about who controls the most or plays prettier. You want pretty? Go to a pageant contest. It is about winning the game when the opportunity presents itself. I watch a lot of games and the ones who hug the ball and make it pretty don't always win. Sometimes a power team controls the ball all afternoon. Then one mistake and the opponent scores just one goal and wins.
Never seen or heard of a game where anybody went up to the ref to say "Our team outplayed the other, we moved it better, had better control, we had more shots on goal and our girls are prettier, therefore you should give us the win"
I wasn't there and just saw the score. Pretty soccer won't take you anywhere if you don't win. How is the wind a factor? They switch sides at half time. Does it affect SRSA more than Feeters? If so, how?
One could argue about being to windy, to hot, to wet, to cold, etc. But again, it affects both teams the same
when they're both out there. Is not like Feeters were playing with a wind protector of some sort.
I'm not a Feeter fan or parent. Just giving credit where its due.

Referee wrote: Soccer is about goals. The one who scores the most wins. Always. It is not about who controls the most or plays prettier. You want pretty? Go to a pageant contest. It is about winning the game when the opportunity presents itself. I watch a lot of games and the ones who hug the ball and make it pretty don't always win. Sometimes a power team controls the ball all afternoon. Then one mistake and the opponent scores just one goal and wins.
Never seen or heard of a game where anybody went up to the ref to say "Our team outplayed the other, we moved it better, had better control, we had more shots on goal and our girls are prettier, therefore you should give us the win"
I wasn't there and just saw the score. Pretty soccer won't take you anywhere if you don't win. How is the wind a factor? They switch sides at half time. Does it affect SRSA more than Feeters? If so, how?
One could argue about being to windy, to hot, to wet, to cold, etc. But again, it affects both teams the same
when they're both out there. Is not like Feeters were playing with a wind protector of some sort.
I'm not a Feeter fan or parent. Just giving credit where its

I totally disagree...soccer is not about "goals" unless ALL you care about is winning. I would rather my kid play with skill and possession. Even if their team lost because the other team had their girls just kick the ball every time it came to them to some big footed girl up top who just happen to get it in the goal more times than we could.