04 League Scores - 2/22 thru 2/23

wait so will LFS take 2 teams select or one? If they are taking 2 it would be in lfs whites best interest to play without the lfs black players. If the squads will be mixed and a top team formed then mix them up and start to get it all worked out. Sure people may not like it but you have a full squad to build.

Now for the record it was a tie against LFS white for scott and I don't care if joey himself was driving the double decker bus scott cannot tie LFS. Scott is headed to the top and if they are going to be on top then the expectation of performance will be there every week. Let's get it together guys. Unacceptable   bad mr scott   

4DaLuvofTheGM wrote:I can hostly say, there is no real consistency with the top two DT teams. It's like Dr Jeckyll & Mr. Hyde with them. I'm just calling it as I see it.

Post of the year material here.

Imagine the world we live in where we can't get consistent performances out of 9 year old girls...THE HORROR!

slrsoccer wrote:

4DaLuvofTheGM wrote:I can hostly say, there is no real consistency with the top two DT teams. It's like Dr Jeckyll & Mr. Hyde with them. I'm just calling it as I see it.

Post of the year material here.

Imagine the world we live in where we can't get consistent performances out of 9 year old girls...THE HORROR!

I know right.. What will we do without your expert observation.. Oh, THE HORROR!

slrsoccer wrote:

4DaLuvofTheGM wrote:I can hostly say, there is no real consistency with the top two DT teams. It's like Dr Jeckyll & Mr. Hyde with them. I'm just calling it as I see it.

Post of the year material here.

Imagine the world we live in where we can't get consistent performances out of 9 year old girls...THE HORROR!

RASE parents are oblivious to such flaws...afterall, their kids were born there.

My post was based on DT South and DT Scott braking away from the pack.. Nothing more, nothing less.

You guys are safe and you are confident of that right?

Mustangs FC 04 Lopez - 1
Sting Central Cuevas 04 - 0

SDL Scores Needed.  Please Post or PM.  Any help is appreciated!

LFS 04g Black - Kennington v Sting 04G Harr
DT 04 girls Scott v TX Spirit North 04G Khoury
Sting 04 Goodman/Tallal v Liverpool Redknapp 04G - Springate
Mustangs FC 04G Lopez v Sting Central Cuevas 04
LFCA 04G Owen-Amos v Sting East 04 (Chacon)

FC Dallas 04G DeWitt v Mutiny 04G Myers
Sting North 04G Angell v Sting East 04G Boyles
Sting North Blue 05G (Garrett) v AYSES '04 Girls Gold A - Thomas
LFCA 04G Heighway - Raburn v Left Foot Studio, 04 Girls White, Kennington
SRFC 04G Simmons v Andromeda 04G Wells
LFCA 04G Raisbeck (Kim) v Cosmos 04G Black-Wallace
Gunners 04G - Hart v FC Dallas 04G Copa - Ciro
TX Spirit 04G Red Clark v FC Dallas 04G West Kang
Liverpool Carragher Drake/Springate v LFCA 04G Hunt Ramirez

FC Frisco Storm 04G, Tatunay v Dynamo FC 04G Canas
FC Dallas 04G Heald v McKinney Diamonds FC 04G Chapin
Sting 04 Tallal/Goodman v Dallas Rush '04 Girls - Jensen
AYSES '04 Girls Gold B - Thomas v McKinney Diamonds FC 04G Chapin

Texas Spirit 04 Clark v LFCA 04G Owen-Amos Platinum
Sting 04G Goodman/Tallal v Sting 04G Blue Scarfone
Dallas Texans 04 girls Scott v Left Foot Studio 04G White
Dallas Rush White 04' DeLeon v LFS 04g Black - Kennington

p.s.  Thanks to all who have sent me scores via PM... 

LFS white 3
LP heighway 0

4DaLuvofTheGM wrote:My post was based on DT South and DT Scott braking away from the pack.. Nothing more, nothing less.

Don't know who is breaking away and who isn't...didn't even see the game in question, but many would argue that the style LFS supposedly played is the ultimate sign of respect. Someone hit it on the head somewhere in this thread in stating that teams will have to learn how to adjust to that strategy, especially when the games count for real.

slrsoccer wrote:

4DaLuvofTheGM wrote:My post was based on DT South and DT Scott braking away from the pack.. Nothing more, nothing less.

Don't know who is breaking away and who isn't...didn't even see the game in question, but many would argue that the style LFS supposedly played is the ultimate sign of respect.  Someone hit it on the head somewhere in this thread in stating that teams will have to learn how to adjust to that strategy, especially when the games count for real.

Parking da bus JK style!

Has anyone considered that maybe the B team needed players to field a team? If they were for some reason down to 8 or 9 players, wouldn't it be ok to have some play from the A team? JK is a smart guy, and surely wouldn't just have players from his top team steal playing time from the others just to make the outcome of a game look better. Especially this close to select.

Exactly how was "da" bus parked? Did you see it first hand?

Eliza466 wrote:Exactly how was "da" bus parked? Did you see it first hand?

Wasn't talking about this particular game just historical data.

Thought so, time to move on

Eliza466 wrote:Thought so, time to move on

He has a knack for it - Jose Kennington.

Your are referring to a game that was played over a year ago. That's called a "knack"? Ok, then all teams who have a strong defense are "parking the bus"?

Eliza466 wrote:Your are referring to a game that was played over a year ago. That's called a "knack"? Ok, then all teams who have a strong defense are "parking the bus"?

Ah c'mon, chill, relax, don't be a fan girl I'm just giving him respect for it.

OK, kids. I know rumor and innuendo is much more fun, but let's just clear this up now. There are two distinct LFS 04 girls teams, with two different coaches. Both teams have sufficient rosters and both teams will go select (separately).

Unfortunately, two girls from the white team were hurt this weekend (broken toe and hamstring injury). To cover these losses, white borrowed two players from the black team who play the same positions as the hurt girls. It was, by all accounts, a great game that was made a bit difficult by the wind. LFS did not park the bus or anything like that. LFS did, however, play great defense against a very talented and tough DT team. And our goalie had one of her best games to date. We even had a few scoring chances, but just weren't able to put it in the back of the net.

That's it. No drama. No intrigue. Just 10-year-old soccer where, on any given windy day, anything can happen. And on this particular day, the teams tied 0-0.

sounds good to me but if they are both going select and the white team losses 2 players and don't have enough to field a team it means their roster is extremely short to make select with only 1 season left. their roster should be closer to 16 than to 11. so their roster can't be sufficient otherwise why bring in players instead of playing your subs.

Good one GO....valid point.

As much as it pains me to say this... this is the 2nd post in the last 30 mins where GO has made valid points. A deep freeze must be on its way.

Ah yes, the pivot to more innuendo. Only on this forum could that be considered a "valid point."

OK, one more response. I never said we didn't have enough players. We are, in fact, closer to 16 than 11. But when two girls injured in the same week, the bench does get a bit thin pretty quickly. That's why, in basically every sport, when a player goes down, they bring in a sub. Crazy, huh.

(Sorry, sorry, did I just introduce real world logic into this discussion. My bad.)

Really, I am touched by your concern for the team. Who knew that so many people cared so darn much about the team, the bench, their coach, their color, and (apparently) their mode of transportation (we aren't fancy enough for a bus, but wow, thanks for thinking so highly of us!).

Logic? Ain't nobody got time for that.

seamusdog wrote:Ah yes, the pivot to more innuendo.  Only on this forum could that be considered a "valid point."

OK, one more response.  I never said we didn't have enough players.  We are, in fact, closer to 16 than 11.  But when two girls injured in the same week, the bench does get a bit thin pretty quickly.  That's why, in basically every sport, when a player goes down, they bring in a sub.  Crazy, huh.

(Sorry, sorry, did I just introduce real world logic into this discussion.  My bad.)

Really, I am touched by your concern for the team.  Who knew that so many people cared so darn much about the team, the bench, their coach, their color, and (apparently) their mode of transportation (we aren't fancy enough for a bus, but wow, thanks for thinking so highly of us!).

Generally speaking it was a valid point...may have not been the shoe to fit your foot...but it was a valid point. BTW, sometimes its hard not to respond right?!

seamusdog wrote:Ah yes, the pivot to more innuendo.  Only on this forum could that be considered a "valid point."

OK, one more response.  I never said we didn't have enough players.  We are, in fact, closer to 16 than 11.  But when two girls injured in the same week, the bench does get a bit thin pretty quickly.  That's why, in basically every sport, when a player goes down, they bring in a sub.  Crazy, huh.

(Sorry, sorry, did I just introduce real world logic into this discussion.  My bad.)

Really, I am touched by your concern for the team.  Who knew that so many people cared so darn much about the team, the bench, their coach, their color, and (apparently) their mode of transportation (we aren't fancy enough for a bus, but wow, thanks for thinking so highly of us!).

Not sure what REAL world your logic is from. Yes in every sport they bring in a sub but the crazy thing is they always seem to bring that sub in from the team not another team. Kind of like the lakers playing short so they just bring in a couple of studs from the clippers   . You do realize select is coming right? The whole contract you can no longer bring in "subs" from other teams. So either the roster is thin and losing players made you short so you had to bring in players (ie. would have no subs) or you had plenty of players and you brought in help or the delicious 3rd option is a couple of players went down and you had plenty of "payers" but needed to bring in players to replace the ones you lost and didn't want to put the game in the hands of the "payers" you had left. Either way I still say it's scott's fault. A couple of players and a bus still shouldn't have cost them that game.