The newest registered user is Karly
Our users have posted a total of 205242 messages in 32019 subjects
02 QT 2015
Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: 02 QT 2015
SWGSB 52 wrote:
When looking at the roster, I don't even see these alleged players on Sanchez roster. It looks like his roster from last season.
Please know that ECNL rosters can be up to 30 players, with only the top 14-16 in that roster being primary players. The remaining players are the players that are dual rostered and the ones everyone gets excited about when they play LHGCL or any other NTSSA approved league.
It's very likely that a couple of Sanchez's players from last year were chosen to be on the Sting U14 ECNL roster in a dual-roster role. Those players could be anywhere from reserves/backups who may never step on the pitch in actual ECNL match, to players that get significant minutes in every ECNL game.
My DD's team had 2 dual-rostered players last year. One of those players only saw limited action in 1 or 2 ECNL games, 1 of those players progressed to where she was seeing significant minutes in every ECNL game, and this year, she went ECNL exclusively.
The backup player played in all of my DD's team's LHGCL games as far as I can remember, and I think the other player missed 2 of our LHGCL games due to ECNL conflicts, but played in all the rest.
There were teams in U14 D1 last year that had 5-8 players dual rostered with ECNL, and you saw significantly different players on the field/benches depending on if there were ECNL conflicts that day. I believe at least 1 team had to CPP some '02's up to to play with their D1 '01 last fall in order to have enough numbers to play one or two games.
2-3 years ago, I probably would've gotten all worked up about it and been one of those posters on here screaming about how unfair it is. However, the closer my DD gets to HS and possibly even college recruiting, I've found myself far less concerned about W/L, and more concerned about if her training/coaching/league environment is properly preparing her for HS and possibly college. Heck, bring on the ECNL players, as playing against better competition is only going to serve the best interest of my DD's development.
Guest- Guest
Re: 02 QT 2015
dadof3- TxSoccer Addict
- Posts : 1033
Points : 6010
Join date : 2012-07-16
Location : McKinney
Re: 02 QT 2015
Adrenalinetx- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 176
Points : 3580
Join date : 2015-07-27
Re: 02 QT 2015
Good luck to all the teams this weekend!
Sidelined- TxSoccer Lurker
- Posts : 1
Points : 3398
Join date : 2015-07-30
Re: 02 QT 2015
Just_Curious???- TxSoccer Poster
- Posts : 36
Points : 3893
Join date : 2014-05-02
Re: 02 QT 2015
Bierluva- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 349
Points : 5799
Join date : 2010-02-28
Age : 50
Re: 02 QT 2015
Crazy4soccer- TxSoccer Lurker
- Posts : 7
Points : 3764
Join date : 2014-08-04
Re: 02 QT 2015
Adrenalinetx- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 176
Points : 3580
Join date : 2015-07-27
Re: 02 QT 2015
This is entirely true... switch those two and it is all good. No rematches. Pretty even and fair.Crazy4soccer wrote:Ha! All that changing around and back to original format. Made it way harder then it has to be. They could switch Mutiny and FCD East and be done with it and no rematches and brackets would be pretty evened out. Or just leave it as it is because it's becoming way more confusing then it has to be. Good luck teams.
Bierluva- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 349
Points : 5799
Join date : 2010-02-28
Age : 50
Re: 02 QT 2015
Adrenalinetx- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 176
Points : 3580
Join date : 2015-07-27
Re: 02 QT 2015
that would put two Stings and two FCD teams in same bracket- they try to avoid stacking clubs.switch those two and it is all good.
Where they have it now is far better than what it was yesterday, and gets Scott slotted according to the position they earned.
Specially to andro west and mutiny whom had the highest point total
right or wrong, that is not a criteria they use for 2nd Round brackets- the seedings and placement of seeds are determined before Round 1. So if Mutiny was in the 5th seed bracket, and they win their bracket with a lot of points or not so many points, they are still put into the 5th Seed Round Two position. Based on that, the brackets now have
X: 1,4,6,8
Y: 2,3,5,7
SantaFe- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 151
Points : 4294
Join date : 2013-08-19
Re: 02 QT 2015
Bierluva- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 349
Points : 5799
Join date : 2010-02-28
Age : 50
Re: 02 QT 2015
SantaFe- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 151
Points : 4294
Join date : 2013-08-19
Re: 02 QT 2015
SantaFe wrote:that would put two Stings and two FCD teams in same bracket- they try to avoid stacking clubs.switch those two and it is all good.
Where they have it now is far better than what it was yesterday, and gets Scott slotted according to the position they earned.Specially to andro west and mutiny whom had the highest point total
right or wrong, that is not a criteria they use for 2nd Round brackets- the seedings and placement of seeds are determined before Round 1. So if Mutiny was in the 5th seed bracket, and they win their bracket with a lot of points or not so many points, they are still put into the 5th Seed Round Two position. Based on that, the brackets now have
X: 1,4,6,8
Y: 2,3,5,7
Why was that a factor in the 05 group, but not here?
SickofStupidity- TxSoccer Author
- Posts : 934
Points : 4785
Join date : 2014-06-30
Re: 02 QT 2015
If they evaluated performance after round 1, that would actually be understandable. In my view..,
SantaFe- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 151
Points : 4294
Join date : 2013-08-19
Re: 02 QT 2015
SantaFe- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 151
Points : 4294
Join date : 2013-08-19
Re: 02 QT 2015
Bracket A has FCD East playing LP Scott again (FCD 1-0) and Bracket B having Mutiny playing LP Dalglish again (Mutiny 3-0). You would think they would have kept it or switched something else. Too late now, brackets will stay the same.
So with that said, below are who I would take:
Bracket A:
LP Keegan
FCD East
Bracket B:
Andromeda West
Mutiny
SoccerDad2002- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 150
Points : 4851
Join date : 2012-01-30
Re: 02 QT 2015
sideline fan- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 117
Points : 4457
Join date : 2013-02-06
Re: 02 QT 2015
SantaFe- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 151
Points : 4294
Join date : 2013-08-19
Re: 02 QT 2015
SoccerDad2002- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 150
Points : 4851
Join date : 2012-01-30
Re: 02 QT 2015
SantaFe- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 151
Points : 4294
Join date : 2013-08-19
Re: 02 QT 2015
sideline fan- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 117
Points : 4457
Join date : 2013-02-06
Re: 02 QT 2015
SantaFe- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 151
Points : 4294
Join date : 2013-08-19
Re: 02 QT 2015
Round 2 is a lot tougher than Round 1.
SWGSB 52- Original Supporting Member
- Posts : 230
Points : 4874
Join date : 2012-05-11
Re: 02 QT 2015
SantaFe- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 151
Points : 4294
Join date : 2013-08-19
Re: 02 QT 2015
I also feel that once again LP Keegan will be 2-0 with at least 19 points going into SUN's game. If FCD East wins both games as well, then LP Scott and Sting won't be playing SUN nor will Keegan have to play East.
SoccerDad2002- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 150
Points : 4851
Join date : 2012-01-30
Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
» FBR 06G 3-16-2015
» FBR 06G 6/07/2015
» FBR 06G 08-30-2015
» LH Outlook for 2015/16