The newest registered user is Karly
Our users have posted a total of 205242 messages in 32019 subjects
'02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
'02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
Inter-Tier Records
Guest- Guest
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
Last edited by happygilmore on 26/05/11, 09:13 am; edited 1 time in total
happygilmore- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 209
Points : 5771
Join date : 2009-08-24
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
happygilmore- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 209
Points : 5771
Join date : 2009-08-24
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
happygilmore wrote:I understand the one tourn the Rowdies did against weaker teams brought them down, and realize this in completely computer generated. And I can really see Grubbs and SRSA (even tho they have never beaten Rowdies) ranked ahead of them. I can not see South ahead of Rowdies. I realize it's computer generated , but I think in human poll Rowdies should atleast be 3rd.
Can't and won't disagree with you HappyG. Unfortunately, based on the limited data against '02 opponents that I have for Rowdies, this is where they fall. If I could find a way to effectively include Rowdies U10 EAL league results in the '02 rankings, then I'm almost certain they would be ranked higher.
All of this stuff should work itself out in the upcoming fall season. Unless Rowdies decide that they want to go try and play in a boys leagues, they will be playing '02 girls and we will get a more equivalent ranking data set.
Guest- Guest
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
bwgophers wrote:happygilmore wrote:I understand the one tourn the Rowdies did against weaker teams brought them down, and realize this in completely computer generated. And I can really see Grubbs and SRSA (even tho they have never beaten Rowdies) ranked ahead of them. I can not see South ahead of Rowdies. I realize it's computer generated , but I think in human poll Rowdies should atleast be 3rd.
Can't and won't disagree with you HappyG. Unfortunately, based on the limited data against '02 opponents that I have for Rowdies, this is where they fall. If I could find a way to effectively include Rowdies U10 EAL league results in the '02 rankings, then I'm almost certain they would be ranked higher.
All of this stuff should work itself out in the upcoming fall season. Unless Rowdies decide that they want to go try and play in a boys leagues, they will be playing '02 girls and we will get a more equivalent ranking data set.
Can we get humans rankings so we can get the BCS rankings as well?
Guest- Guest
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
kickingrass wrote:bwgophers wrote:happygilmore wrote:I understand the one tourn the Rowdies did against weaker teams brought them down, and realize this in completely computer generated. And I can really see Grubbs and SRSA (even tho they have never beaten Rowdies) ranked ahead of them. I can not see South ahead of Rowdies. I realize it's computer generated , but I think in human poll Rowdies should atleast be 3rd.
Can't and won't disagree with you HappyG. Unfortunately, based on the limited data against '02 opponents that I have for Rowdies, this is where they fall. If I could find a way to effectively include Rowdies U10 EAL league results in the '02 rankings, then I'm almost certain they would be ranked higher.
All of this stuff should work itself out in the upcoming fall season. Unless Rowdies decide that they want to go try and play in a boys leagues, they will be playing '02 girls and we will get a more equivalent ranking data set.
Can we get humans rankings so we can get the BCS rankings as well?
Calling RoidRage and AP Pollster?
Plus, we want to see AP Pollster's avatar again.
anothercrazysoccerdad- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 140
Points : 5435
Join date : 2010-05-19
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
anothercrazysoccerdad wrote:kickingrass wrote:bwgophers wrote:happygilmore wrote:I understand the one tourn the Rowdies did against weaker teams brought them down, and realize this in completely computer generated. And I can really see Grubbs and SRSA (even tho they have never beaten Rowdies) ranked ahead of them. I can not see South ahead of Rowdies. I realize it's computer generated , but I think in human poll Rowdies should atleast be 3rd.
Can't and won't disagree with you HappyG. Unfortunately, based on the limited data against '02 opponents that I have for Rowdies, this is where they fall. If I could find a way to effectively include Rowdies U10 EAL league results in the '02 rankings, then I'm almost certain they would be ranked higher.
All of this stuff should work itself out in the upcoming fall season. Unless Rowdies decide that they want to go try and play in a boys leagues, they will be playing '02 girls and we will get a more equivalent ranking data set.
Can we get humans rankings so we can get the BCS rankings as well?
Calling RoidRage and AP Pollster?
Plus, we want to see AP Pollster's avatar again.
I'll do my rankings after this weekends tournaments. So probably Tuesday morning...since Monday is a holiday!
RoidRage- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 324
Points : 5556
Join date : 2010-09-08
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
soccercubed- TxSoccer Lurker
- Posts : 9
Points : 4998
Join date : 2011-03-24
Location : The Third Dimension
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
soccercubed wrote:Gopher, just wanted to let you know that Dynasty is 10-2-1, not 6-2-1, this spring. Had some makeup games that went late into May. Thanks for doing the hard work.
Yeah. I saw after I put everything together this week that Arlington PAL had finally updated their results. Those results have been added to the database and will be reflected in next week's rankings.
Guest- Guest
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
soccercubed wrote:Gopher, just wanted to let you know that Dynasty is 10-2-1, not 6-2-1, this spring. Had some makeup games that went late into May. Thanks for doing the hard work.
impressive who was the one loss to?
RedBull- TxSoccer Poster
- Posts : 90
Points : 5051
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
AP Pollster- TxSoccer Poster
- Posts : 40
Points : 5038
Join date : 2011-03-14
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
RedBull wrote:soccercubed wrote:Gopher, just wanted to let you know that Dynasty is 10-2-1, not 6-2-1, this spring. Had some makeup games that went late into May. Thanks for doing the hard work.
impressive who was the one loss to?
Dynasty lost to Polaris
Guest- Guest
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
No big deal, I understand lack of games in reg age bracket hurts. Thanks for your hard work I enjoy loooking ar the rankings when they come out.bwgophers wrote:happygilmore wrote:I understand the one tourn the Rowdies did against weaker teams brought them down, and realize this in completely computer generated. And I can really see Grubbs and SRSA (even tho they have never beaten Rowdies) ranked ahead of them. I can not see South ahead of Rowdies. I realize it's computer generated , but I think in human poll Rowdies should atleast be 3rd.
Can't and won't disagree with you HappyG. Unfortunately, based on the limited data against '02 opponents that I have for Rowdies, this is where they fall. If I could find a way to effectively include Rowdies U10 EAL league results in the '02 rankings, then I'm almost certain they would be ranked higher.
All of this stuff should work itself out in the upcoming fall season. Unless Rowdies decide that they want to go try and play in a boys leagues, they will be playing '02 girls and we will get a more equivalent ranking data set.
happygilmore- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 209
Points : 5771
Join date : 2009-08-24
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
soccercubed- TxSoccer Lurker
- Posts : 9
Points : 4998
Join date : 2011-03-24
Location : The Third Dimension
Re: '02 Girls FBR Rankings - 5/23/11
soccercubed wrote:In response to RedBull: Dynasty lost to polaris 2-1, saw some girls we've never seen play for them before in that game. Also lost to 1-0 to Solar East Barnes in a good game. Going to play some summer tournaments with a mix of established and some newer girls to try some stuff out, see you all there.
Yes it was a good game. We were missing our top center Def and keeper that game and just came from a Prime Time Game. We played back to back games on Sunday. Far as refering to players never seen before. You are just reaching for why you lost. Just say good game and realize Polaris is the real deal and they stepped up that game. The two new girls we added were from Rec that we are developing. Basicly the same team that Won the Legends tournament. Look forward to playing you again!
Guest- Guest
» Nut's 03 Girls Rankings
» '03 Girls FBR Rankings - 03-26-13
» '03 Girls FBR Rankings - 04-24-13
» '05 Girls FBR Rankings - 05-13-13