FBR 06AP 6-27-2016

This updated FBR is as of 6/27/16. Only 06AP teams with 3 or more games since March 1, 2016 are included in the FBR published rankings.   All games in the U10 leagues and tournaments that "publish results" are included even if they are still 05/06 teams except if they played 11v11.  However, only teams that are playing as 06AP teams are included in the rankings (players born Jan 1, 2006 and younger only).  Any team with a Aug 05 to Dec 05 player has been excluded from the published rankings.

If your team is missing and you are 06AP with three or more games in please verify with me that you are 06AP now and I will start including your team.  If you are a team that plays one day with 06AP and one day with traditional aged 05/06 players I have two accounts for your team and only the 06AP account will be published in FBR.

As always regulation scores are used for FBR....not OT and no PKs that determine a game result. No U11 games are included in the data.  Forfeits do not count in FBR.   FBR is presented as W/L/T not W/T/L

Looks like solar would be better off trying to combine their top teams to make one really good one...instead of fielding three mediocre ones.

soccerjack wrote:Looks like solar would be better off trying to combine their top teams to make one really good one...instead of fielding three mediocre ones.

I would not in any shape or form label Solar Red "mediocre" in any context.

soccerjack wrote:Looks like solar would be better off trying to combine their top teams to make one really good one...instead of fielding three mediocre ones.

Instead of using a picture of a donkey maybe you should just post a picture of your own ass

uknowme wrote:

soccerjack wrote:Looks like solar would be better off trying to combine their top teams to make one really good one...instead of fielding three mediocre ones.

Instead of using a picture of a donkey maybe you should just post a picture of your own ass

Goodness...a little up tight about u-little soccer today?  I'm afraid if I sent a pic of my a$$ it would turn you're puckered lips into a smile and you would just ask for more.  Didn't mean to insult you and I'm sure your little Mia is being scouted by the uswnt right now at 10. Just pointing out there might be a shot at number 1 in the 06 fbr if they mixed it up a little.

Shouldn't be calling 10 year old girls Mediocre.

I see.......ok I'm gonna let you in on a few crazy things that elude you...common sense, sarcasm and a sense of humor. I noticed that solar had 3 teams in the top of the rankings very impressive. "common sense"....then I posted what I did "sarcasm"....then you should have chuckled at the statement..."sense of humor". You get it? kind of a joke when they obviously have done very well. Now quit asking me to send another pic of my a$$.

Are they asking for pictures of your a$$ too!?!

Are you sure it was the kids he was calling mediocre???

?

CatchyUserName wrote:

soccerjack wrote:Looks like solar would be better off trying to combine their top teams to make one really good one...instead of fielding three mediocre ones.

I would not in any shape or form label Solar Red "mediocre" in any context.

Ok..I get what you're saying now...red rocks"...it's the other two that are mediocre. Fair enough. My mistake.

Cleansheets wrote:Are they asking for pictures of your a$$ too!?!

They have no shame....I feel so dirty.

I have no clue what "red rocks" means, my dd does not play for a solar team if that's what your insinuating. What I do know as a parent whose child has played the solar red team many times of late is that they are a very strong team that does not need the other two "top" solar teams in the least, in any position.
I also know that you are nowhere near as clever as you think you are.

CatchyUserName wrote:I have no clue what "red rocks" means, my dd does not play for a solar team if that's what your insinuating.  What I do know as a parent whose child has played the solar red team many times of late is that they are a very strong team that does not need the other two "top" solar teams in the least, in any position.
I also know that you are nowhere near as clever as you think you are.

So if they don't need any help from the other two teams....then why can't they overtake sting black for the number 1 position?

Awww man, the jig is up soccerjack. They know you are not  as clever as you think you are. Dang Gina! all the fun is over now.

Cleansheets wrote:Awww man, the jig is up soccerjack. They know you are not  as clever as you think you are. Dang Gina! all the fun is over now.

Geez...I sneak out for a few cocktails with soapbox mom and come back to find out that the church ladies are on to me.

I just wish they would pick an original color....

Turquoise???? Anyone?????

I think Solar Red is the only team that did not post open practices for JDL.

Sho'Nuff wrote:I think Solar Red is the only team that did not post open practices for JDL.

You think they plan on drawing kids from the mediocre solar teams, so they can beat sting black?

soccerjack wrote:

Sho'Nuff wrote:I think Solar Red is the only team that did not post open practices for JDL.

You think they plan on drawing kids from the mediocre solar teams, so they can beat sting black?

I think Solar is setting up well for DA, ECNL, Composite, and a couple LH byes.

Sho'Nuff wrote:

soccerjack wrote:

Sho'Nuff wrote:I think Solar Red is the only team that did not post open practices for JDL.

You think they plan on drawing kids from the mediocre solar teams, so they can beat sting black?

I think Solar is setting up well for DA, ECNL, Composite, and a couple LH byes.

You would certianly hope so. ....considering there's no competition for da and very little for ecnl. Composite and jdl are just the monetary benefits of the other two.

soccerjack wrote:Looks like solar would be better off trying to combine their top teams to make one really good one...instead of fielding three mediocre ones.

NO, NO, NO.

No merge at this age, we know who will benefit from the merge, we know who you are.

PowerKick wrote:

soccerjack wrote:Looks like solar would be better off trying to combine their top teams to make one really good one...instead of fielding three mediocre ones.

NO, NO, NO.

No merge at this age, we know who will benefit from the merge, we know who you are.

Shoot....you figured out my devious plan. Let me know what it is...so I can carry it out please.

This is the most inaccurate FBR I have seen just prior to signing in years. It isn't all that surprising with the sloppy introduction of AP and JDL, but King Tut will have too many lopsided games due to the inaccuracy of FBR, which they claim "not to use." In years past, you could slot the top 10-15 at LH Qualifying without the help of the King Tut tourney, but beyond the top three (DTS, Red and Sting) its a crap shoot.

I don't think you need to merge Blue and Black....they basically share a roster.