NTX Seeding Showdown attendees

KnKsDad wrote:

Used2bKix wrote:

the7wolf wrote:Given LP Dalglish can just scrimmage RASE any day of the week and RASE can scrimmage 03 RASE plus 03 boys in the club, I kinda see go99's point that $600 for a tournament when you can get the prep work taken care of in your own back yard seems a bit pointless.

Prep work ehhhhhhh yeah....but sometimes family scrimmages just doesn't quite bring out the intensity that some rival team trying to smash you does. Besides...I don't think they mix that RASE/Dalglish thing too much...it would be kind of a "conflict of interest" per say...but I'm just guessing though.

Right. Just because they can doesn't mean they do. And I agree, they can do the prep work anyway they want, but that wasn't the point I was challenging. It was the suggestion that the past "body of work" reflected in the last FBR ranking should justify a top seeding despite no recent body of work. A top of the bracket seeding from a #5 ranking vs a top of a bracket seeding from let's say a #12 ranking presents two different levels of challenge. As competitive as this 04 group is, especially in the "top 20", it could make a difference in where a team ends up. If the LH folks want to see performance with a fixed roster, then so be it. If performance is going to play a big factor then so should no performance.

WingNut wrote:

KnKsDad wrote:

Used2bKix wrote:

the7wolf wrote:Given LP Dalglish can just scrimmage RASE any day of the week and RASE can scrimmage 03 RASE plus 03 boys in the club, I kinda see go99's point that $600 for a tournament when you can get the prep work taken care of in your own back yard seems a bit pointless.

Prep work ehhhhhhh yeah....but sometimes family scrimmages just doesn't quite bring out the intensity that some rival team trying to smash you does. Besides...I don't think they mix that RASE/Dalglish thing too much...it would be kind of a "conflict of interest" per say...but I'm just guessing though.

Right. Just because they can doesn't mean they do. And I agree, they can do the prep work anyway they want, but that wasn't the point I was challenging. It was the suggestion that the past "body of work" reflected in the last FBR ranking should justify a top seeding despite no recent body of work. A top of the bracket seeding from a #5 ranking vs a top of a bracket seeding from let's say a #12 ranking presents two different levels of challenge. As competitive as this 04 group is, especially in the "top 20", it could make a difference in where a team ends up. If the LH folks want to see performance with a fixed roster, then so be it. If performance is going to play a big factor then so should no performance.

phhhfphhhf. Bring me another margarita......jacka$$s. What in the world....one small tournament down and a total push. These 10 year olds need to buckle down and get their act together. Go99s dream of world domination could come to an end when they are 12! What will we do then? We were planning on these kids playing Russia at 13. This is total bs.....ecnl....womens national team blah blah.....lhgcl...ppl....kenny dalglish is such a f$g....I got something to rase in the woods go...your past body of work can polish my donkey willie. I hope your dd isn't as concerned about it like you are.


So knk. You ALWAYS have something choice to say about RASE and or Dalglish. Did our 10 year old kids upset you sometime?  Are you upset that two of your former players are w LP now?   I could be wrong but I don't ever recall any of our parents on either team saying anything negative about your team?  You feel so inclined to always in every  post  put some type of negative spin on things.  You know what they say. If you don't have something nice to say then well you obviously don't know the rest!

Oh and I think our coach is qualified to make decisions for our teams. But if your so confident you can do better as your opinion infers then feel free to call him and discuss your vast soccer knowledge w him

soccerjack wrote:

WingNut wrote:

KnKsDad wrote:

Used2bKix wrote:

the7wolf wrote:Given LP Dalglish can just scrimmage RASE any day of the week and RASE can scrimmage 03 RASE plus 03 boys in the club, I kinda see go99's point that $600 for a tournament when you can get the prep work taken care of in your own back yard seems a bit pointless.

Prep work ehhhhhhh yeah....but sometimes family scrimmages just doesn't quite bring out the intensity that some rival team trying to smash you does. Besides...I don't think they mix that RASE/Dalglish thing too much...it would be kind of a "conflict of interest" per say...but I'm just guessing though.

Right. Just because they can doesn't mean they do. And I agree, they can do the prep work anyway they want, but that wasn't the point I was challenging. It was the suggestion that the past "body of work" reflected in the last FBR ranking should justify a top seeding despite no recent body of work. A top of the bracket seeding from a #5 ranking vs a top of a bracket seeding from let's say a #12 ranking presents two different levels of challenge. As competitive as this 04 group is, especially in the "top 20", it could make a difference in where a team ends up. If the LH folks want to see performance with a fixed roster, then so be it. If performance is going to play a big factor then so should no performance.

phhhfphhhf.  Bring me another margarita......jacka$$s.   What in the world....one small tournament down and a total push.  These 10 year olds need to buckle down and get their act together.  Go99s dream of world domination could come to an end when they are 12!  What will we do then?  We were planning on these kids playing Russia at 13.  This is total bs.....ecnl....womens national team blah blah.....lhgcl...ppl....kenny dalglish is such a f$g....I got something to rase in the woods go...your past body of work can polish my donkey willie.  I hope your dd isn't as concerned about it like you are.  


So knk. You ALWAYS have something choice to say about RASE and or Dalglish. Did our 10 year old kids upset you sometime?  Are you upset that two of your former players are w LP now?   I could be wrong but I don't ever recall any of our parents on either team saying anything negative about your team?  You feel so inclined to always in every  post  put some type of negative spin on things.  You know what they say. If you don't have something nice to say then well you obviously don't know the rest!

Oh and I think our coach is qualified to make decisions for our teams. But if your so confident you can do better as your opinion infers then feel free to call him and discuss your vast soccer knowledge w him

WingNut wrote:

KnKsDad wrote:

Used2bKix wrote:

the7wolf wrote:Given LP Dalglish can just scrimmage RASE any day of the week and RASE can scrimmage 03 RASE plus 03 boys in the club, I kinda see go99's point that $600 for a tournament when you can get the prep work taken care of in your own back yard seems a bit pointless.

Prep work ehhhhhhh yeah....but sometimes family scrimmages just doesn't quite bring out the intensity that some rival team trying to smash you does. Besides...I don't think they mix that RASE/Dalglish thing too much...it would be kind of a "conflict of interest" per say...but I'm just guessing though.

Right. Just because they can doesn't mean they do. And I agree, they can do the prep work anyway they want, but that wasn't the point I was challenging. It was the suggestion that the past "body of work" reflected in the last FBR ranking should justify a top seeding despite no recent body of work. A top of the bracket seeding from a #5 ranking vs a top of a bracket seeding from let's say a #12 ranking presents two different levels of challenge. As competitive as this 04 group is, especially in the "top 20", it could make a difference in where a team ends up. If the LH folks want to see performance with a fixed roster, then so be it. If performance is going to play a big factor then so should no performance.

So knk. You ALWAYS have something choice to say about RASE and or Dalglish. Did our 10 year old kids upset you sometime?  Are you upset that two of your former players are w LP now?   I could be wrong but I don't ever recall any of our parents on either team saying anything negative about your team?  You feel so inclined to always in every  post  put some type of negative spin on things.  You know what they say. If you don't have something nice to say then well you obviously don't know the rest!

Oh and I think our coach is qualified to make decisions for our teams. But if your so confident you can do better as your opinion infers then feel free to call him and discuss your vast soccer knowledge w him

soccerjack wrote:What in the world....one small tournament down and a total push.  These 10 year olds need to buckle down and get their act together.  Go99s dream of world domination could come to an end when they are 12!  What will we do then?  We were planning on these kids playing Russia at 13.  This is total bs.....ecnl....womens national team blah blah.....lhgcl...ppl....kenny dalglish is such a f$g....I got something to rase in the woods go...your past body of work can polish my donkey willie.  I hope your dd isn't as concerned about it like you are.